![]() I wanted them always in the wordfile to get them also highlighted. The wordfiles I made for various C compilers for various controllers contained always all functions specific for the libraries/compiler extensions (some even for version of compiler/library set), but not mixed with standard C functions. should those items be in the wordfile since they are part of the "Standard" or should they be in an auto-complete file? I'm thinking everything that is part of the standard should probably go into the wordfile, and things that are specific to a compiler or extensions that Microsoft uses or whatever should be part of an auto-complete file specific to that compiler or extension set. What it does not contain, however, are Objects (like cin and cout), Types, and Manipulators found within library classes, which I am trying to determine if they should be in the actual wordfile, but it would be extremely helpful to have them in an auto-complete file at the very least. ![]() I also added new groups, /C7"Standard C Library" and /C8"C++ Stand Template Lib", where I placed all the functions contained within those standard libraries. I kept the groups "C Keywords" and "C++ Keywords", except that I removed the Preprocessor commands to a new group in /C6"Preprocessor", where I also added the predefined preprocessor variables: _DATE_ _FILE_ _LINE_ _STDC_ _TIME_ _cplusplus I have started out with the c_plusplus.uew that comes with UltraEdit 18.10. Before I go to the trouble of completing it, I thought I'd check and see if anyone else has already done the work on it, or at least find out what others think should be included in it. SO does anyone here use UltraEdit and either knows which file to use or can recommend one? I'm running the latest versions of UE & UC.I have started work on a C++11 wordfile. ![]() And those differences are not helpful (to me at least) in understanding which to use. I've used UltraCompare on various pairs of these files, and they're all at least slightly different. These are worthless since nearly all of those wordfiles simply shows they were changed "5 years ago". If I understand correctly, such comments are simply a short description of the purpose of the latest update, so it isn't useful in determining which is the correct file to use/ Also, no specific dates are shown for the AutoIt wordfiles just how many years have passed since the last change. AU3WORDFILE.uew has the following note: "Normalize all line endings" (most wordfiles have that same comment associated with it). ![]() So there are multiple files to choose from: AU3WORDFILE.uew, AutoIt.uew, autoit300.uew, and AutoIt_v3.2.12.1.uew. The official download page is at:, but there's also a Github download page at. The problem is, there are multiple versions and I can't figure out which I should use. That includes using UE's Wordfiles for syntax highlighting and the like. I doubt very much that I'll switch to using UE but I want to compare SciTE & UE with as many bells and whistles that UlltraEdit can provide. au3 files for a while now and wish to continue to use). It's a superb tool! But since I also own UltraEdit and UltraCompare, I figured I'd try them to work with AutoIt files, just out of curiosity and for the hell of it (with the exception of UltraCompare, which I've been using with.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |